/
/
/
The Economic Edge of Automated Medical Literature Monitoring in Pharmacovigilance

The Economic Edge of Automated Medical Literature Monitoring in Pharmacovigilance

In modern pharmacovigilance, monitoring medical literature plays a crucial role in timely detecting information regarding drug safety. Recently, an increasing number of companies have adopted automated solutions for literature monitoring, significantly impacting their economic operations.

Cost Reduction in Monitoring

Automating the process of monitoring medical literature significantly reduces costs compared to manual methods. The primary reason is that automated systems require only a one-time investment in software and its maintenance. In contrast, manual monitoring requires the constant involvement of qualified specialists, leading to high labor costs.

Manual monitoring involves experts proficient in local languages who analyze articles weekly, compile reports, and pass the results to the central team, which then prepares the final documents. This process is not only time-consuming but also costly. Estimates show that implementing this process, for example, across all European countries can require significant financial investment.

Increased Efficiency and Accuracy through Automated Medical Literature Monitoring

Automated medical literature monitoring systems provide high accuracy and up-to-date data. Unlike humans, who can make errors due to fatigue or underestimating the significance of information, machines perform processes consistently and accurately every time. This reduces the risk of missing important data, which is critical for pharmacovigilance.

Moreover, automation enables continuous monitoring, whereas the manual method is typically conducted periodically (weekly). Constant monitoring enables quicker detection of new safety data, enabling faster responses to potential threats.

Centralization and Systematization of Data

Automated medical literature monitoring solutions allow for the centralization and systematization of data. All articles and metadata are stored in a single database, making analysis easier. The manual method, on the other hand, requires creating separate reports for each country, complicating the consolidation and analysis process.

With a centralized system, each process step can be easily tracked, from accessing the article text to the final data delivery. This ensures a high level of transparency and allows for the quick identification and correction of errors or discrepancies.

Risk Reduction

In manual monitoring, there is always a risk of delays or errors in reports. Specialists might be late providing data, misinterpreting it, or missing important information. Automated systems are free from these drawbacks, reducing the risks associated with human factors.

CriteriaAutomated SolutionManual Search
Labor CostsMonthly/yearly payments for using systems, usually in the form of a subscription serviceContinuous high costs for specialist labor
Accuracy and ConsistencyHigh accuracy, no human errorVariable, prone to errors due to fatigue or oversight
Monitoring FrequencyContinuous monitoringWeekly
Data CentralizationAll data stored in a single databaseDispersed reports from different countries
EfficiencyHigh efficiency and speed of data processingDependent on specialist’s working speed
RisksMinimal, no delays or errorsHigh, potential for delays and errors
Source CoverageCovers a larger number of sourcesTypically limited to known sources
Transparency and TraceabilityFull transparency, traceable at every stepLimited transparency, reliant on specialist’s quality of work
Text ProcessingInstant search through large volumes of textSlow manual analysis and search
Language SupportAutomatic language detection and translationRequires specialists for each language
Resource UtilizationOptimal use of technological resourcesRequires significant human resources
Data RelevanceAlways current search resultsResults may become outdated between monitoring periods
This table highlights the clear advantages of using an automated solution for monitoring medical literature in pharmacovigilance compared to traditional manual methods.

Conclusion

The economic benefits of using automated solutions for medical literature monitoring in pharmacovigilance are evident. Reducing labor costs, increasing efficiency and accuracy, centralizing and systematizing data, and mitigating risks make automation the preferred choice for pharmaceutical companies. Implementing such systems optimizes the monitoring process and ensures high quality and timeliness in managing drug safety.

The use of automated solutions in pharmacovigilance is not only economically advantageous but also enhances the system’s overall efficiency, ultimately positively impacting patient safety.

Looking for Expert Guidance?
Our team is on hand round the clock to guide you on how to enhance your literature screening or to offer consultation on your pharmacovigilance processes.
Unlock the Secrets of the Pharma Industry
Get Your Hands on Our Must-Read Business Case Today!
Follow us
Request a demo
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Have questuions?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

DrugCard has roots in Ukraine. Support all Ukrainians in their fight against russian aggression

X